On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 08:04, Steve Snyder wrote: > It seems that the current GLibC package for RHL v9 is noticably slower > than the lastest GLibC for RHL v7.3. > I can't think of any reason for the performance difference other than the > version of GlibC libraries used. For both versions of RHL the i686 > versions of the respective GLibC RPMs are installed and running on a > Pentium4 machine. The same version of the Linux kernel is used in bother > environments. Then you are not running "official" Red Hat Linux... do you get the performance difference also using the latest versions of the Red Hat kernels for both distributions? > Can anyone tell me why the newer version of GLibC is slower than the old? > Is there a way to improve performance with the newer code? My guess is changes in the kernel scheduler algorithm and/or tuning done by the distribution's init scripts. Klaasjan -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
