I don´t know what´s happening but this week my server was crashed a couple of times and the only thing that is registering in the log is Nov 11 05:29:40 correo kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 4654 (httpd). Nov 11 05:41:41 correo kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 4655 (httpd). Nov 11 05:46:30 correo kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 4650 (httpd). Nov 12 05:15:53 correo kernel: kmod: runaway modprobe loop assumed and stopped Nov 12 05:28:55 correo kernel: kmod: runaway modprobe loop assumed and stopped Nov 12 05:37:52 correo kernel: kmod: runaway modprobe loop assumed and stopped Nov 12 05:40:03 correo last message repeated 2 times Nov 12 05:40:07 correo kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 5324 (httpd). And after that the server didn´t register anything else. Please somebody can help me. Thanks. Luigi. -----Original Message----- From: shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of shrike-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 1:00 PM To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Shrike-list digest, Vol 1 #1096 - 6 msgs Send Shrike-list mailing list submissions to shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to shrike-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Shrike-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: fedora gets poor reviews (Jesse Keating) 2. Re: DHCP-Server (shane c branch) 3. GTk installation? (shane c branch) 4. Re: fedora gets poor reviews (Guy Fraser) 5. Re: DHCP-Server (John Haxby) 6. multiple monitors (Brian Manser) --__--__-- Message: 1 From: Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Organization: j2Solutions To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: fedora gets poor reviews Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 08:28:07 -0800 Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:57, Jorge Boscán Etura wrote: > One of the bugs that I found unaceptable to find in fedora core 1 is > "ye olde" rpm bug(since rh8), of course it can be fixed by the user but why? Can you duplicate this bug reliably using RH provided tools? I have been wholly unable to reproduce it. - -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy) Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/s7EX4v2HLvE71NURAvZYAJwPe1gF3HcalP1zg5UmIpppkfRgdgCgl+q6 lsIY3OIZ01ercyyOFekIr4Q= =v8q9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --__--__-- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:31:01 -0500 From: shane c branch <scbranch@xxxxxxxxxx> To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: DHCP-Server Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Glenn Remstedt wrote: > list, > > I'm running RH9.0. Trying to run a DHCP-Server, after downloaded both > "dhcp-3.0pl1-23:1.rpm" and installed. > When going to make the configuration via /etc/dhcpd.conf the file is > not there!? > What am I doing wrong here?? > > Thanks, for any advice on this. > > you have to create it first #touch /etc/dhcpd.conf then you may edit the file. -- regards, shane --__--__-- Message: 3 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:34:38 -0500 From: shane c branch <scbranch@xxxxxxxxxx> To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: GTk installation? Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx where would this be located? i have an rpm for an im client that requires GTk.so. when i tried # whereis GTk or # whereis GTk.so all i get back is GTk: -- regards, shane --__--__-- Message: 4 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:51:46 -0700 From: Guy Fraser <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Organization: The Internet Centre To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: fedora gets poor reviews Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Well I have briefly looked at Fedora on Tuesday. I thought the install went well. Since I installed everything, I guess I would not have run into as many dependancy problems. I did install everything because from past experience the package management tools that came with RHL in its previous life were not that great. From what I could tell most things worked as I expected them to, and there were some improvements with some of the GUI configuration utilities. It is a little early in the game to make too many pot shots, but I would like to see some of the reviewiers points ironed out. I didn't try too many things, that failed, but GAIM would not connect to MSN, SANE could not find my USB scanner {HP 3570} and the video capture for my ATI AIW 8500DV still does not work. I hoped these would be fixed, but wasn't expecting them to be. I also hoped that wine would have been put back into the distribution and new that mp3 would be. In summary I seems like Fedora is in better shape that RH 9 when it came out, and I didn't find any nasty problems. For the most part I was impressed, and hold hope that the Fedora community will rally around and fix most of the short falls. My next project will be to install the RHEL WS beta I downloaded or the Evaluation, but I expect that it will not have many of the tools I use for development and testing and frankly I can't see many of my customers paying the price asked for these products when they don't even come with wine for the odd program that needs it or mp3 to soothe the operator through a long hard days work. Since you have to pay for RHEL WS the old "cost of licencing" song just doesn't hold to many tears anymore, nor does the song about not including wine for "licencing reasons" carry a tune. But since were talking about Fedora I'll leave them dogs where they lay or lie whatever it is :) Richard Horvitz wrote: >This is sad. No more Redhat Linux, outside of the enterprise version, >and here is the first release of fedora getting poor reviews: >http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/12/2323256 >Where to turn? > > > > -- Guy Fraser Network Administrator The Internet Centre 780-450-6787 , 1-888-450-6787 There is a fine line between genius and lunacy, fear not, walk the line with pride. Not all things will end up as you wanted, but you will certainly discover things the meek and timid will miss out on. --__--__-- Message: 5 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:54:02 +0000 From: John Haxby <jch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: DHCP-Server Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Glenn Remstedt wrote: >list, > >I'm running RH9.0. Trying to run a DHCP-Server, after downloaded both >"dhcp-3.0pl1-23:1.rpm" and installed. >When going to make the configuration via /etc/dhcpd.conf the file is >not there!? >What am I doing wrong here?? > > Nothing. There isn't a default configuration file. There's an example in /usr/share/doc/dhcp-* which you can use as the basis for a configuration file. Well, that's what I did anyway. jch --__--__-- Message: 6 Subject: multiple monitors From: Brian Manser <brianm@xxxxxxxxx> To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Organization: Date: 13 Nov 2003 16:58:28 +0000 Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx --=-UFq1wWshgK/PfYVC4aZn Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Does anyone know how to set up multiple monitors in RH9 using indivduel cards Brian --=-UFq1wWshgK/PfYVC4aZn Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/1.1.8"> </HEAD> <BODY> Does anyone know how to set up multiple monitors in RH9 using indivduel cards<BR> <BR> Brian </BODY> </HTML> --=-UFq1wWshgK/PfYVC4aZn-- --__--__-- -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list End of Shrike-list Digest -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
