> -----Original Message----- > From: shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Iain Buchanan > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 12:43 AM > To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Modified Split DNS Question > > > On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 13:52, Jake McHenry wrote: > [massive quoted message snipped] > > > My second question still stands though, is there a way for > me to have > > dns work for all the client machines without using the > hosts file on > > the windows boxes? > [snip] > > What about DHCP? I haven't read all of your posts, so I > don't know if you've set it up or not, but DHCP will let you > set the clients DNS search order. Also, I found it _much_ > easier than setting up a DNS server. > > Regards, > -- > Iain Buchanan <iain@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > -- > Shrike-list mailing list > Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike> -list > I'm not using dhcp because of remote administration. I have ports being forwarded in the router to the private ipaddresses, so to know what machine I'm connecting to, I cannot implement dhcp. All of the clients use only one name server, being 192.168.1.98, the only dns server in use. Jake McHenry Nittany Travel MIS Coordinator http://www.nittanytravel.com -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
