RE: File Server irritants (newbie)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>1)	Prevent users from logging in at the keyboard of the server.

Keep the server under lock and key.. :) There might be other alternative but
as far as I go. I go with LOCK.


>>2)	Each user's private directory has Linux OS (I guess) related

Create a Shell script to transverse through all the directories and delete
those files!! OR... look into /etc/.skel  This is where _all_ the files in
user directories will be copied from.

>>3) 	Somewhere in the mix I setup a public directory.  Users have

What exactly do you want here? I don't understand.

>>4)	I have a folder and account setup called pcguest.  "bad-user"
>>defaults to that folder but has not access in it.

Samba has a "bad-user". This is the default (i think) for  the below reasons

<snip>
# If you want users samba doesn't recognize to be mapped to a guest user
map to guest = bad user
<snip>

This means that for users that are not authenticated in your server
(meaning, their username/pass combo is not in Linux's Passwd/smbpasswd file
then they will only have read access (if you grant it to them)

>>5)	What am I not thinking of?
In my setup, I have a share folder made especially for users to share files
across the lan. Everyone can have write/read access. It's like the /tmp
folder in Linux. This seems to be the most popular folder.



HIH :)

Cheers,
Mun Heng, Ow
H/M Engineering
Western Digital M'sia 
DID : 03-7870 5168


-----Original Message-----
From: Buck [mailto:RHList@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:21 AM
To: RH Shrike
Subject: File Server irritants (newbie)


I am happy to say I have finally succeeded in installing and configuring
a file server that allows for group control.

Here are the particulars:
Workstations are all Windows computers (Currently they are Win2kpro but
I need to keep the option open for connecting 95/98 computers.  I have
not had need to connect MACs and don't know how to support them.)
Each user is a member of one or more groups.
Each member has a home/membername directory. Its only use is for the
user's My Documents folder to be mapped there.
Each group has a home/groupname directory mapped to a common drive name
for each group member (i.e. accounting is always mapped to drive G: and
management is always mapped to drive H:)



Here are a few things that I would like to change

1)	Prevent users from logging in at the keyboard of the server.
The users buck, root and net manager will need permission to log from
the keyboard but I don't want ANYONE in the company to have access to
the server directly from the keyboard.

2)	Each user's private directory has Linux OS (I guess) related
files.  Since they won't be using Linux, I would like to either delete
them or create empty directories like the groups create.

3)	Somewhere in the mix I setup a public directory.  Users have
browse access and nothing else.  I think I know how to remove it though.


4)	I have a folder and account setup called pcguest.  "bad-user"
defaults to that folder but has not access in it.  I am wondering if I
can remove that account and folder as I see no need to have guest
accounts at this time.  Guest accounts need to be on the workstations
and guests have no reason to access my server, at least not in the
business model I am using.

5)	What am I not thinking of?


I have learned that initially setting up Linux as a firewall is a PITA,
lots of work, I can save the necessary config files to make next time
quick and easy.

It looks like I have to modify the samba.conf for each group I add, but
adding users is very easy. 

I downloaded samba-2.2.8a-2rh9.i386.rpm from Samba.org.  I read that 3.x
does not include SWAT (which I like).  Earlier on a previous install I
tried updating to 3.x but the system still shows 2.x being used.  I
don't know if it is important that I upgrade or not.  I don't care as
long as the version I am using will work safely and reliably.  It might
be that SWAT isn't compatible, I don't know.  I didn't try to install
3.x on this system.  I'll leave it up to those of you with more
experience to let me know if it is something I need or not. 

When I installed RHL 9, it installed Samba and when I installed the
Samba 2.x that I downloaded, it appeared to have uninstalled the
previous version. 

Once the dust settles on the four items listed above, I will want to add
backup and security.  Once those are completed, I will have my dedicated
file server and will select feature to learn.

Thank you all for your help.

Buck



-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list


-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux