Re: The end of RHL for private use? [was: Fedora vs. RHL]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Guy Fraser wrote:


By the way buck, RHL 9 is just as easy if not easier to install than XP. On a fresh
install now XP has to be restarted at least 5 times to apply all the updates, RHL 9
only needs one to start using the current kernel ;^)


We'll just have to see if Fedora will be too painful due to constant upgrading.

If apt is all the debian fans say it is, it will be a piece of cake to keep fedora updated.

Joe


-- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux