Nay, as far as I know there is no nero for linux. But there is k3b. And god knows, it's cooler. The CVS version (soon to be released as 0.10) suports dvd burning and a bunch of features. And as Seth said: "it is spiffy, IMO".
Vantroy
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
hehe.. No.. actually this is my dad's desktop.. (and Yes.. I should've changed thread)
nero for M$. (is there a nero for Linux?? If Yes.. I'm switching..)
The media(imation) is rated at 1-48x. (tried 24,32,40,48x works on <24x)
Running simulation mode.. only yielded like ~3M to 4M/s transfer rate. If I
run the "test all drives transfer speed" I get up to 40MB/s.
so.. what gives??
Cheers,
Mun Heng, Ow
H/M Engineering
Western Digital M'sia DID : 03-7870 5168
-----Original Message----- From: Randy Kelsoe [mailto:randykel@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:22 AM To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Burn Speed to CD-R (was Re: SATA problems)
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
NeroSo ATA66 is about as fast as your hardware will exploit with two
drives on the cable. ATA100 reduces bus contention for "both rives
ready simultaneously"
Okay..okay.. This is VERY Off-track.. but maybe you guys can shed some light..
I just bought a CD-writer (52x24x52 attached as master on 2nd IDE channel -
UDMA mode 2) and I've got 2 HD attached to the primary IDE channel. Both
drives are UDMA5 on ATA100 (on a ATA133 capable M/B) Burning disc using
can't get me higher than 24x! The reason it's giving me is..transfer rate
from source data is too slow. (I'm burning from a 120GB 8MB cache Master
Drive. Slave is a 20GB 2MB Cache)transferring
So.. what's up.. Running a disk transfer rate test saw my 120GB
at ~40MB/s.You're running Nero for linux? :-P
So..what's up. Does the above holds true???
In order to get the maximum burn speed, you need fast media. What brand of CD-R are you using, and what's it's speed rating? If it's rated at 24x, that's the best you can expect to get.
-- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
