Re: BigBrother and Redhat 9 - Memory leak?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	No - not according to ipcs -m.

Eric Stewart - Network Admin, USF Tampa Campus Library - eric@xxxxxxxxxxx
Managing sysadmins is like leading a neighborhood gang of neurotic pumas on
       jet-powered hoverbikes with nasty smack habits and opposable thumbs.
       - Feen, Benjy: Pumas on Hoverbikes: Sysadmin Management,
       http://www.monkeybagel.com/pumas.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: shrike-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:shrike-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:55 AM
> To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Shrike-list digest, Vol 1 #907 - 14 msgs

>    5. Re: BigBrother and Redhat 9 - Memory leak? (John Haxby)
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:08:40 +0100
> From: John Haxby <jch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: BigBrother and Redhat 9 - Memory leak?
> Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> OpenOffice appears to have the same problem -- memory is 
> eaten and not 
> reclaimed.
> 
> Does Big Brother leave shared memory segments allocated? (ipcs -m)
> 
> jch


-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux