Re: RH9 on a dual-processor?

[Joe <joe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Globe Trotter wrote:

> --- Klaasjan Brand <kjb@xxxxxx> wrote:
>  
>
> > On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 00:54, Globe Trotter wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > thanks, all! someone on this list earlier suggested a kernel 2.4.20-xx
> > >      
> > where xx
> >    
> >
> > > is a high number for optimal perfomance. the dual processor did come with
> > > 2.4.20-8 pre-installed. does it make any sense to move to a higher kernel?
> > >      
> > Yes!
> >
> > The errata kernels offer bugfixes, performance improvements and most
> > important: fixes for security problems.
> >
> > Klaasjan
> >
> >    
>
> Thanks! Which kernel would you/folks recommend?
>
>  
The one you get when you run "up2date" - which is a function of several 
things including time.

Joe


--
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list