On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 11:08:44 at 11:08:44AM -0400, William Hooper (whooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> I think it intersting that the hardware requirements for this release > >> are somewhat lower than for RH 9. Any thoughts on this? > > > > Tighter code (fewer patches)? Dropped apps or features? Typo? ;-) > > > > dmc > > More likely the result of the installer (anaconda) changes. Red Hat > itself can run on lower spec machines, but the installer drives the > "minimum requirements" (see the RULE project). > Well, RULE indeed proved exactly that point. Thanks to Michael Fratoni for slinky (8 MB of RAM) and the kdrive RPMs, see the RULE website. Ciao, Marco Fioretti -- Marco Fioretti m.fioretti, at the server inwind.it Red Hat for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/en/ [media giants] have no idea how to do business with resourceful human beings rather than passive vegetables. So they run to [the] government for protection." -- Doc Searls on the SSSCA, in Linux Journal -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
