John Haxby said: > Brian Ashe wrote: > [a well reasoned and fine message] > > I wish I was that literate. > > jch Unfortunately, neither argument is a certainty of one piece of software being of better quality than another. (even though I have a preference for sendmail) Be sure to not confuse an opinion with a proof :-) However, in my opinion, the qmail guy is definitely too arrogant to trust his software. Everyone knows that software has bugs, but I definitely get the impression that this guy thinks his software will never have security bugs by reading a lot of what he has said on his website - it's too over-the-top for me. Good design does not guarantee 'no bugs' And I love the extreem exaggeration of the statement "sendmail's design means that any minor bug in 41000 lines of code is a major security risk" Any programmer will know the stupidity of that statement. I think working for the MS PR department would be a good job for him :-) -- -Cheers -Andrew MS ... if only he hadn't been hang gliding! -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
