On Friday 18 July 2003 13:20, Price Technology wrote this in an attempt
to be witty and informative:
<snip>
> Fear not my son, for it is good.
But is it as good as Red-Carpet 2.x?
>
> Seriously, I've used it before and it works just fine. Solved one of
> the biggest problems I had with installing stuff under previous
> versions; recursive dependancies I call it. ("packagea" depends on
> "packageb" which depends on "packagec" which in turn depends on "some
> elusive filename that I don't know where the hell it is" etc.)
That IS nice to know. Dependency resolution was my biggest complaint
from RedHat.
>
> I like to think of it as part of Red Hat's efforts to make Linux
> usable for "normal people".
Unfortunately a lot of people still view Linux as a novelty or toy OS.
>
> Carry on, and may the source be with you.
May the latency be low and the bandwidth high.
>
> Joebewan
--
Wielder of the mighty +1 LARTsaber of Unsubscribe Instructions At End of
Message, the +3 Clue-by-Four of No Attachments to a Mailing List, and
the -4 Shield of No Spell Checker
http://joseph-a-nagy-jr.homelinux.org http://mc-luug.homelinux.org/
--
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
