Anyone try building older Red Hat kernels with NTPL?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm pretty unimpressed with the ATA support in newer kernels.  I've had
issues with ATA in various Red Hat 2.4.19 and 2.4.20 kernels, but pretty
much no issues with issues in 2.4.18 and earlier.  I heard some of the
ATA code is no longer in recent kernels (a lot of Hendrick's work?).  As
such, I'm wondering if anyone has attempted to patch the Red Hat
2.4.18-27.8.0 kernel with NTPL?  Do I absolutely need NTPL in the kernel
if I'm running Red Hat Linux 9?

The other issue is that I'll have is the NFS client is pretty crappy and
unreliable in pre-2.4.20 kernels, unless I go back to 2.4.9 (which seems
to be a "staple" of Red Hat's Enterprise kernels for good reason).  As
such, has anyone attempted patching 2.4.9 with NTPL (I assume not given
the massive VM/scheduling changes in 2.4.10+?).  What about the
enterprise 2.4.18-e31 kernel?

Just looking for a way to balance my ATA needs (largely optical drives,
since my disks are on 3Ware controllers, even for workstations) with
NFS.

Thanx in advance ...


-- 
Bryan J. Smith, E.I.             b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx
MCSE/MCSA, RHCE/LPIC-2, SCSecA/SCNA and dozens more
http://thebs.org         http://thebs.org/certs.pdf



-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux