Re: Ahh redhat!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Justin Zygmont wrote:

linux still has some distance to cover before it is truely considered desktop ready, it is getting there.

Linux the kernel has been ready for years.

As to desktop "readiness", I would put it like
this: Various distros offer varying degrees of
newbie-friendliness -

I switched to Linux on the desktop back in
1995 or so - so it's not a matter of whether
linux is ready - it's a matter of culture and
mindshare.

For a newbie who has a tough time with
redhat, I'd recommend something like
lycoris aka redmond linux -

No,  do not like redhat out of the box, but
I'm comfortable with redhat, and have a
standard list of fixes and tweaks that I
perform upon installation, and for desktop
boxes, a trip to freshrpms, gurulabs and/or
fedora rounds things out - and Ihave to
say it it works pretty well for me.

In time, I trust that the Linux movement,
having finally begun to focus on desktop
issues, will achieve the same excellence
which has resulted in such growth in the
server arena - it's just a matter of time.

Joe





Please can we push RH to get this sorted? RH8/9 are in my list of worst
*ix's ever!


Oh please - tell us about your wonderful multimedia
and gaming experiences on unixware - or sco - or
solaris. It will be interesting to see the height of the
bar you are raising.

Joe




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux