What would be the most stable RH version to install on this new Athlon XP with limited udates required to bring it up to a secure, rock-solid box?
All this thing does is Samba and Masq. I've built tons of these boxes to replace Winbloze servers that seem to have problems weekly. Now my name is mud with this client 'cause this RH box has been rebuilt two times now.
Thanks
damonp
--On Saturday, May 24, 2003 10:02 PM +1000 Con Tassios <ct@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| |> (Question : I have experienced all of this so why was all this not seen |> prior to release ? This is supposed to be Red Had Update and not |> Rawhide.) - Update for the Xinetd-2.3.11-1.9.0 super-server effectively |> hinders/breaks down carefully crafted rexecs/rlogins/rsh permissions |> which I need for my OpenMosix-cluster. | | Like it or not Red Hat has now declared the technology focus for Red Hat | 9 and beyond is on useability. Performance, scalability, availability | and stability, which are critical factors in any server environment, is | what Red Hat is focusing on in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux range of | products. | | This make Red Hat Linux 9 a poor choice for servers. Anyone who runs 6.2 | or 7.2 in a server environment cannot expect the same sort of stability | if they upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9. | | | | -- | Shrike-list mailing list | Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx | https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
----------------- s i l i c o n s y s . c o m ----- damonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.siliconsys.com web app development ----- s i l i c o n s y s . c o m -----------------
