On Sat, 2003-05-17 at 02:29, Warren Togami wrote: > On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 19:31, Mark Guzzo wrote: > > > > > > I don't know if you noticed but both of those sites support both apt AND > > > yum. > > > > > > so there is no need to choose. > > > > > > -sv > > > > > > > > > > > Yes I know, I just wanted to know which one a person like better and > > why. Kind of like GNOME and KDE, they are both desktops but I have > > reasons why I like Gnome better. > > > > I don't what this to become a flame war. > > > > >From the fedora web site it says that yum is built to handle rpms, while > > apt4rpm is a "work around". > > > > Huh? We certainly didn't write that. (If we did, please provide the > URL.) apt and yum are roughly equivalent in doing everything. We > really don't care which you use. I personally use both every day. > > -- > Warren Togami Fedora Linux Project > warren@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.fedora.us > GPG 0x54A2ACF1 3rd party packaging community for Red Hat Linux > 785A 304B 08C1 F291 F54F 9A68 6BDD FE8E 54A2 ACF1 > Oops! I'm sorry, I got that info off someone else's post. "must think before I type" ;-)
