On Thursday, May 15th 2003 at 23:48 -0400, quoth Michael Fratoni: =>--[PinePGP]--------------------------------------------------[begin]-- =>On Thursday 15 May 2003 10:31 pm, Steven W. Orr wrote: =>> First I tried with my custom config and the build failed. =>> =>> Then I tried with a stock config. The one I'm using is =>> kernel-2.4.20-athlon-smp.config =>> =>> I did a make clean; make dep and then a make bzImage. That dies in =>> net/atm on pvc.c with: =>> =>> pvc.c: In function `pvc_bind': =>> pvc.c:45: union has no member named `af_atm' =>> pvc.c: In function `pvc_getname': =>> pvc.c:67: union has no member named `af_atm' =>> make[3]: *** [pvc.o] Error 1 =>> =>> So then I tried again and this time I did a make mrproper before doing =>> the clean and dep. I ended up failing with an error about not having =>> autoconf.h (which is supposed to be in include/linux). =>> =>> Can someone *please tell me exactly what the steps are to rebuild? :-( => =>This normally works for me, though I haven't built 2.4.20-13.9 => =>cd /usr/src/linux-2.4 =>mv .config config.save =>(If it exists) =>make mrproper =>mv config.save .config =>(or cp configs/some.config.for.your.arch .config) =>make oldconfig =>make dep && make bzImage && make modules \ =>&& make modules_install && make install => =>Hope that helps, =>-- =>-Michael Sorry. It doesn't help at all. If I do a make mrproper then the make clean and dep work but the make bzImage dies right away with [root@xxxxxx linux-2.4.20-13.9]# make bzImage gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/split-include scripts/split-include.c make: *** No rule to make target `include/linux/autoconf.h', needed by `include/config/MARKER'. Stop. [root@xxxxxx linux-2.4.20-13.9]# So the only way I know to get the autoconf.h back is to reload the kernel-source rpm file. Anyone? -- -Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have - -happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ -Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- -individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? steveo at syslang.net
