On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 11:44, Tom Diehl wrote: > On 30 Jun 2003, Jeremy Portzer wrote: > > > Why would you be running the RHL 8.0 version of redhat-config-network on > > RHL 9 anyway? I mean, maybe I'm missing something here, but it seems > > that it's fairly presumptious to mix and match configuration software > > like this (old r-c-network, new OS) and expect it to work. Can you > > explain? > > He is running 8.0. He asked here b/c he was unable to solve his problem on > the psyche list. Hmm, I missed that part somehow. Anyway, there are very few drawbacks IMO to upgrading to RHL 9, so considering that r-c-network is much better in 9, I'd recommend an upgrade! ;-) -Jeremy -- /=====================================================================\ | Jeremy Portzer jeremyp@xxxxxxxxx trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \=====================================================================/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
