Message: 7 Subject: Re: Making a 2.4.21 for Redhat From: Klaasjan Brand <kjb@xxxxxx> To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Date: 18 Jun 2003 09:23:07 +0200 Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 08:06, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
I'm sorry if I'm saying nonsenses... During the RedHat 9 beta, I did compile a stock 2.4.20 without the NPTL backport patches and GNOME and Nautilus hung. I filled in a bug report but it was closed as "expected if you don't have an NPTL-enabled kernel".
Maybe the NPTL patches have been integrated into 2.4.21 mainline without me getting notice of it.
Nope. NTPL is scheduled for 2.5, but I believe the RH folks patched some
of the bugs which showed up when booting a kernel without NPTL. It
worked for me anyway...
-- Klaasjan Brand <kjb@xxxxxx>
shrike-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Send Shrike-list mailing list submissions to shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to shrike-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Shrike-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: mbox files (Joe) 2. OT: Red Hat Reports Fiscal First Quarter Results (Charles Griffin) 3. Re: FIXED! Re: The mysterious disappearing text in Mozilla (D. D. Brierton) 4. Re: RedHat9 RAID woes (Willem Riede) 5. Re: Making a 2.4.21 for Redhat (Felipe Alfaro Solana) 6. Re: managing desktop content for user. (Eric Doutreleau) 7. Re: Making a 2.4.21 for Redhat (Klaasjan Brand) 8. Re: FIXED! Re: The mysterious disappearing text in Mozilla (Cameron Simpson) 9. Rebuilding Squid (Dusan Djordjevic) 10. starting skript for sendmail (mardon) 11. Re: Rebuilding Squid (Andrew Smith) 12. Re: Rebuilding Squid (Adrian) 13. Re: printer problem (Markku Kolkka) 14. Linux Router (Galea Gilbert) 15. RE: Linux Router (Pavel Rozenboim) 16. RE: Linux Router (Galea Gilbert)
--__--__--
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:49:18 -0700 From: Joe <joe@xxxxxxxxxx> To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: mbox files Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Rigoberto de la Cruz wrote:
I have 2 mbox files that would like to join. What is the best way to do so? I was thinking on something like this:
$ cat mbox1 >> mbox2
It might look like a dumb question, but I'm concerned that the attachments wont be copied or any other problem can occur.
You can do this without touching the original mbox files -
cat mbox1 mbox2 > newmbox
Then look at "newmbox" with your mail client and see if it's OK -
meanwhile mbox1 and mbox2 are unchanged.
Joe
--__--__--
Message: 2 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:08:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Charles Griffin <cng3@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: OT: Red Hat Reports Fiscal First Quarter Results To: Shrike List <shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Truly excellent news. Great job, Red Hat!
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=2945448
Charles
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
--__--__--
Message: 3 Subject: Re: FIXED! Re: The mysterious disappearing text in Mozilla From: "D. D. Brierton" <darren@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx Organization: DZR Web Development Date: 18 Jun 2003 03:08:49 +0100 Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 02:37, Cameron Simpson wrote:
It would be interesting to post a "diff -u" between the good prefs.js
and the bad one.
I don't think there's any need to post the whole output of diff -u (it's very, very long). I can tell you what the most significant difference is: the new prefs.js does not have a single line beginning
user_pref("font.
in it. My old prefs.js files had survived numerous OS upgrades,
re-installs and fresh installs, and had been in place, tweaked over
time, through numerous versions of Mozilla (from the old milestone days)
and Galeon (pre-1.0). Long before Unicode became the norm, and font
handling became sane, I had manually set the fonts for every single
encoding. Now this used to work, but I suspect that the settings were
just too complicated and baroque for their own good. I guess I'll see
how well things stand up when I browse pages in non-European scripts,
but I'm reasonably confident that Red Hat have got this stuff working
quite well now.
Best, Darren
--
__o _-\<,_ Brian
(_)/ (_) bikehead@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx x503
