On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 12:57, Kai Raven wrote: > > Hello Jeremy, > > On 04 Jun 2003 11:56:37 -0400 you wrote: > > > BUT, it should be pointed out that xpdf support many of the features > > that acroread does. For example, complicated PDFs include hyperlinked > > table of contents, links that open other PDFs, include outside files, > > etc. None of this works right in xpdf. Also, xpdf has much poorer > > image quality than acroread in my experience. So, there are lots of > > good reasons to use Adobe's Acrobat Reader. > > last time i had an encrypted pdf from a darpa mil site, where copy/paste > wasn't allowed. Than i compiled xpdf with a patch to break the > restrictions. Is this possible with acroreader too? > VERY good point, and I'm not saying xpdf is useless. I was just pointing out reasons why someone might use acroread. --Jeremy -- /=====================================================================\ | Jeremy Portzer jeremyp@xxxxxxxxx trilug.org/~jeremy | | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 | \=====================================================================/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
