On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 21:30, Klaasjan Brand wrote: > Don't count on it. Seems like the 2.6 TODO list is still long enough to > use as wallpaper for a medium sized house I guess we should be really > happy if 2.6 can be declared this year... but RedHat has backported most > of the interesting stuff to 2.4 it seems... > > It might be a good idea to make 2.5/2.6-test rpm's available to increase > bug feedback though. Thinking about making them myself, as soon as the > more extreme disk corruption problems are ironed out... > > Klaasjan > > Are there still extreme disk corruption issues in the 2.5 kernel? I thought after they reverted to the old IDE layer rather than attempt the rewrite things were considered "stable enough to generally not corrupt your filesystem"? I am very interested in one day making a test 2.5 kernel RPM compiled for different archs for testing purposes, along with modified initscripts to the handle the kernel and module changes. Would you and perhaps other people be interested in working together on this type of mini-project? -- Warren Togami Fedora Linux Project warren@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.fedora.us GPG 0x54A2ACF1 3rd party packaging community for Red Hat Linux 785A 304B 08C1 F291 F54F 9A68 6BDD FE8E 54A2 ACF1
