I have a small home network connected to the internet via a router with NAT and a printer connected to my main pc. For reasons that are not relevant here I use aliases (eth0:1) to define my home network (172.16.x.x numbers). I connect to the router via dhcp (192.168.x.x numbers). As I only communicate between the pc's with ssh and ftp over ssh this is adequate for my needs. I use the RH "medium security" 'firewall' to get some extra 'protection'. In principle I can print files from my laptop, say, by ftping the file to my main pc and then printing it from there. But now with Shrike installed on all pc's I wanted to use cups/sharing to print directly from the 'remote' pc. Just like I had used it with cups on RH-8.0. But then I had a dedicated pc as firewall/router with 2 ethernet cards (one for the 'internet' and one for the 'home network'). And I experienced no problems configuring cups through the browser (or by hand) and adding the few necessary browse and address items to cupsd.conf by hand. Now with Shrike I decided to use the 'redhat-config-printer' tool to configure cups printing/sharing (as advised). This works perfectly for my main pc. I can print without problems. But I can't print from a remote pc. I see two possible problems: 1) redhat-config-printer does not seem to produce a correct cupsd.conf file. These are the last lines of cupsd.conf: </Location> Browsing On BrowseProtocols cups BrowseOrder Deny,Allow BrowseAllow from @LOCAL Listen 127.0.0.1:631 Some other posts on this list have also mentioned this. Can cups function in a local network by only listening on 127.0.0.1:631 or should the adress of the pc with the printer be included here (like I had it when in the situation described above last year). Editing cupsd.conf by hand has no effect. 2) the "medium security firewall". I added an ACCEPT rule to RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT to enable packets for udp port 631 but printing remotely then still does not work. So I suspect that the main problem is 1). Can somebody give me some hints on how to solve this? I suspect that both problems will have to be adressed. Alexander