Re: Tough Filesystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thx for reply

it is compatible SCSI card.. (don't remember what exactly). Any idea to
create this SCSI RAID 1 hardware-based? or Linux based?

thx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren Togami" <warren@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: Tough Filesystem


> On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 20:38, David Sudjiman wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I'm about to replace my NT2000 data center to RH9 (not yet, still
DL-ing). I
> > read about ext3 vs reiserfs but still can't make up my mind on which one
I
> > should use? All I care is about data safety not performance since this
will
> > not act as a networked data center.
> >
> > It is a PC with 1 SCSI interface for two HD (2x36GB mirrored by NT), can
I
> > use Linux mirror (how?) or I better rely on my SCSI mirror? (how?). The
> > problem is always about the HD, it is doing chkdsk every time I restart
and
> > notify that one or more file was broken.
>
> What SCSI RAID controller do you have?  It depends on the controller
> whether SCSI RAID or Linux software RAID is better.
>
> >
> > I need a good and tough Linux Filesystem, any recommendation or perhaps
URL
> > and howtos?
> >
> > thx for your help
> > ..dave
>
> Use ext3.  It is very reliable in Red Hat Linux, while reiserfs is not
> officially supported.  If you use ext3 you should not have many long
> fsck (Linux' chkdsk equivalent) even after an improper shutdown because
> of the filesystem journal.  Saves much time.
>
> Warren Togami
> warren@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> --
> Shrike-list mailing list
> Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux