Re: kernel-2.4.20-9, invalid GPG signature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I don't think it is a good idea to tell people not to [top post, bottom
post, middle post, any other kind of post.] I'd rather see what the
poster has to say and not fuss about the chosen style of posting -- as
long as they aren't flaming each other or using offensive language, I
mean. You can rub someone the wrong way by instructing him or her on how
to post your way; it is really a matter of personal style.

Bob Cochran
Greenbelt, Maryland, USA




On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 18:20, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Joseph Phillips wrote:
> > How do I know if I need:
> > 
> > A) kernel-2.4.20-9.i586.rpm
> > 
> > or
> > 
> > B) kernel-2.4.20-9.i686.rpm
> 
> A. Please don't top post.
> 
> B. uname -a should tell you what you're running now.
> 
> i386 is for i386 or higher, contains no CPU optimized code
> 
> i586 is for i586 or higher, contains Pentium optimized code suitable for the
> Pentiums, Cyrixs, and AMD K5's.
> 
> i686 is for i686 or higher, contains PentiumPro optimized code, also
> suitable for PII, PII, and P4, and K6, and Athlon systems.
> 
> athlon is for AMD Athlon or higher systems, including Athlon XP, MP, etc.
> 
> -Rick
> 
> -- 
> Rick Johnson, RHCE #807302311706007 - rjohnson@xxxxxxxxxx
> Linux/Network Administrator - Medata, Inc.
> PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc
> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux