Hi, Yeah, those licensing schemes^W^Wsupport contracts with the RHN support stink. We know enough of GNU/Linux to do the support ourselves, but with a short EoL, the time saved by just upgrading the packages is lost to the cost of self maintaining SRC rpms with the new updates. Still, that cost is way cheaper than the support contracts for AS, so fsck them. All we wanted was to be able to download the updates on a timely manner to our local mirror, for a reasonable EoL. For that, we'd pay, but not at any cost, sorry, but the RHN support contracts are unreasonable if you only want the updates to save some time. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part