Re: any ETA for a working "rpm"??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 6 Apr 2003, Jesse Keating wrote:

> On Sunday 06 April 2003 01:19, Klaasjan Brand uttered:
> > So? All apt does is fork an "rpm -Uvh" process for the app it wants to
> > install. And yes, it's happened to me in both cases.
> 
> Blink, you sure about that?  Last time I looked at apt, it did not pass things 
> off to the /usr/bin/rpm binary, and instead tried to use the rpm libs itself.  
> Have they fixed this yet?

Blink-Blink ... and apt-rpm did not check for other running
RPM processes, and ran with --nodeps, practically guaranteeing
a 'deadly embrace' lockup, needing a 'kill -9' and database
repair to remedy with the post rpm-4.0 database model.

-- Russ Herrold





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux