Re: prelink and rpm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 11:58:42AM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 00:37, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:40:20PM -0500, Steve Snyder wrote:
> > > 
> > > What's the argument against, say, RPM automatically running prelink any 
> > > time a package installs files to /lib and /usr/lib?
> > 
> > If you want to wait 20 minutes after each rpm -i, then there is no
> > argument against it.
> 
> Well, at least in theory, you don't have to prelink everything again
> after each install. Only the things that changed need to be prelinked
> again.

Those that changed and those that depend on those that changed.
Ie. in glibc upgrade we're back to everything.

	Jakub





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux