> -----Original Message----- > From: Wolfgang Gill [mailto:wolfgang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thu, March 20, 2003 2:09 AM > To: 'psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx' > Subject: RE: Digital camera question > > > That's really strange. The Canon Powershot S45 only hit the market in > November last year. (I thought it was out for at least 6 > Months) And the new > libraries support it. Your camera may not be that popular, > which may be the > reason it's not supported yet. > > Sorry that it didn't fix your problem. As without the vendor > and Product Id > info you will not be able to get it to work. I think gphoto only supports cameras that use some proprietary protocol. My camera supposed to be a mass storage device, similar to disk on key and other devices. On the internet I found some report about same problems with similar cameras (including digimax 340, which shares user manual with my camera). So, I give up for now. May be I'll buy a supported compactflash reader. Pavel. > > Wolf > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pavel Rozenboim [mailto:pavelr@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2003 10:04 PM > To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Digital camera question > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wolfgang Gill [mailto:wolfgang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tue, March 18, 2003 4:21 PM > > To: 'psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx' > > Subject: RE: Digital camera question > > > > > > Did you read my early post???. You need to update your > > gphoto2 files and > > libraries. I had the same problem with my Canon PowerShot S45. After > > updating the GPhoto2 related stuff it worked!! Check out the > > web link in > > that post for more info. > > I got the newest gphoto2 and libgphoto2. It still does not > recognize the > camera, which is not surprising, as it is not in the list of supported > cameras. > > Thanks anyway. > > Pavel. > > > > > Wolf > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pavel Rozenboim [mailto:pavelr@xxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Monday, 17 March 2003 10:01 PM > > To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: Digital camera question > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dan Devine [mailto:dannyboy259@xxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Thu, March 13, 2003 11:47 PM > > > To: RedHat 8.0 mailing list > > > Subject: Re: Digital camera question > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:39, Thomas Dodd wrote: > > > > Pavel Rozenboim wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I have Samsung digimax 410 camera. It can be connected to > > > PC with USB cable. > > > > > According to the /var/log/messages it is recognized as > > > USB mass storage > > > > > device and usb-storage and some scsi related modules (sg, > > > sd_mod and > > > > > probably some others) are loaded. I see its listing in > > > > > /proc/bus/usb/devices. I read somewhere on internet that > > > I should be able to > > > > > > > > Ity appears to have recognized the camera then. > > > > > > Not so fast.....I've had problems with mine too, and while > > it did show > > > up in the /proc/bus/usb/devices (it gave me the > manufacturer id and > > > model id and whatnot) and in the /proc/scsi directory (as a > > connected > > > device), it still wasn't really recognized as a proper USB > > device and > > > I wasn't able to do anything with it (i.e. mount and unmount). > > > > > > I've found the best information on specific devices at the > > linux-usb > > > page. > > > > > > http://www.linux-usb.org/ > > > > > > check the supported devices for your model...... > > > > > > http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/search_res.php?pattern=samsung > > > > > > > I found Digimax 340 with a report that it doesn't work either. > > > > > You may be able to adapt the device info header for the > Digimax 340 > > > series to work with the Digimax 410. I'm not sure what > > modules those > > > are in though. After you complete your mods (if they are > > not already > > > there), you will also have to recompile..... > > > > Where should I look for it? I tried to search the entire > > kernel tree for > > vendor id/vendor name but could not find anything > > appropriate. Are those > > drivers located in drivers/usb subdir? > > > > > > > > In my experience, I simply copied another header from a > > similar series > > > that was supported and modified the model code to match what I was > > > getting from the /proc/bus/usb/devices file. I also > > modified the text > > > description to match my model. This worked like a charm. > > > > > > You should be seeing 0x0839 or 0x0836 for the digimax > series, along > > > with a "model identifier" after that. > > > > I see vendor id 0x0839 and model id 0x000A. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "just" mount it as scsi device. I tried to mount > > > /dev/sd[a-d][1-4] as well > > > > > as /dev/sd[a-d] devices, but always got an error that it > > > is not valid block > > > > > device. Do I need some camera specific driver? If not, > > > how so I find the > > > > > right device to mount? Does anyone have any experience > > > with this camera? > > > > > > > > #cat /prc/scsi/scsi > > > > > > > > That should list the scsi devices in your system. > > > > > > > > The output of lsusb and the dmesg results following the > > > hotplug event > > > > would be helpfull. So would lsmod output. > > > > > > > > -Thomas > > > -- > > > Dan Devine <dannyboy259@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > ###################################################################### > > Attention: > > This e-mail message is privileged and confidential. If you > > are not the > > intended recipient please delete the message and notify the sender. > > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author. > > > > This e-mail has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal > > www.marshalsoftware.com > > > ###################################################################### > > > > > > > > -- > > Psyche-list mailing list > > Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > > > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > > ###################################################################### > Attention: > This e-mail message is privileged and confidential. If you > are not the > intended recipient please delete the message and notify the sender. > Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author. > > This e-mail has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal > www.marshalsoftware.com > ###################################################################### > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list > -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
