Tony Nugent wrote: > I would complain. It is one thing to scan for and block/drop > viruses and spam (and "bad" attachments etc), but filtering content > with a "profanity" block in otherwise legitimate emails is > tantamount to unilateral censorship. What right have they to do > that? Profanity blocking can be a very legitimate tool in the right circumstances. It's a good way to filter a great deal of pornographic spam if you have no other blockage in place. In a standard office environment profanity can be an indicator of non-work related traffic (or at least inappropriate correspondance). There are any number of reasons to filter profanity; some legitimate, some less so. I pesonally don't give a hoot if people want to filter their mail or not. But it bloody well should be a proper filter, shouldn't it? I've had mail bounce off a profanity block because of the word tool. I couldn't believe it. There are wankers and there are wankers. Andy -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
