Re: Up2date

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, M A Young wrote:

> On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Harold Helmich wrote:
> 
> > What are the issues with changing the channel the name in up2date from 
> > your current dist to the next?  If I update all is that the same as 
> > installing new version?  Can I selectively update packages this way? 
> >  For example get the latest version of X?
> 
>  I tried upgrading releases by upgrading all the packages a few releases
> back, admittedly on a disposable machine, without any problems that I
> remember. Provided you don't jump major versions it will probably work,
> but it certainly isn't supported, and if it breaks you get to keep all the
> pieces. The difference between a package upgrade and a normal upgrade is
> that RedHat can make extra fixes, and improve package selection during the
> normal upgrade process. 
>  Note that if you upgrade something like X, there are probably other
> subsiduary packages you need to upgrade as well (and dependencies in
> rawhide or beta releases aren't always complete), so you may end upgrading
> most of the system anyway. I would have said a prerequisite for trying it
> is good rpm handling skills (eg. dependency tracking). 

If you want an example of what might go wrong look at
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83737
where the problem is likely to be that not enough packages upgraded, quite
possibly the rpm package.

	Michael Young



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux