Re: Much Slower than 7.2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tuesday, December 24, 2002, 5:01:42 PM, James wrote:
> I don't know how much of your work is proprietary, but it seems like
> you want to notify the kernel developers. You are doing something
> that is out of the ordinary for most of us on the list.

Pretty much all of it. I can't imagine what I'm doing that would be so
weird. I have a whole lot of data in text form in a few dozen files. I
read through this data and pick out pieces that I need to save,
converting the format of those pieces to binary or flag bits as I go.
During the processing, I must do lookups within the data that has
already been read, in order to calculate certain pieces of the new
data's effects. When everything is finished, I construct a couple of
indices to the data and write the whole schmeer out to disk.

As far as I can tell, the main things I'm exercising are disk i/o and
the paging system (as I don't have enough memory to keep the whole
thing resident).

Thursday, December 26, 2002, 7:11:25 AM, Javier wrote:
> Is your process doing lots of disk I/O? If so, tell us about the
> filesystem. Is it ext2 or ext3? Or something else? I've seen filesystem
> choice give drastic performance changes on high disk I/O processes.

Yes, a fair amount. All three runs are using ext2 filesystems for
everything. The two HP runs, the drive and filesystem were not changed
between the RH 7.2 run and the RH 8.0 run.

Ron.



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux