On scale of reliability for I would place the OS's in this order: Win98 :2:Complete sh*t. WinME :1:DOS is better then WinME. Win2k Server:8:Solid. NT4:6.5 WinXP: No XP servers in production. WinXP Desktop:8.0 Redhat 8.0: No 8.0 servers in production yet, still used as test-production machines. Redhat 8.0 Desktop:8 Redhat 7.3 Desktop: 7.0 Redhat 7.3 Server:8.5 Close to solid, but hard to determine kernel problems. This just might be a limitation of me. I get kernel crashes in Linux and I have problems determining what caused them. > --Luke > --Computer Science Sysadmin, MSU Bozeman > --admin(AT)cs.montana.edu 994-3931 > -----Original Message----- > From: psyche-list-admin@redhat.com [mailto:psyche-list-admin@redhat.com] > On Behalf Of Craig White > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 7:39 PM > To: psyche-list@redhat.com > Subject: Re: Red Hat 8 - Instability - AGAIN > > On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:11, medina@campinas.unimed.com.br wrote: > > Ok. I apreciate all your advices.. most of all telling me to replace > > hardware. I will try to ... starting changing memory. > > > > I have to tell you that I love Linux, but sometimes I lose my temper > with > > it. I have dual boot ( RH and Win98 ) and my Win98 is much more > stable > > than RH. They use the same hardware for 3 years (or more), and RH is the > > only one that hangs ! Strange because it suppose be Win98... :-))) > > > ------ > FWIW - my installation doesn't hang. I think it is far more stable than > Win98...but then again, Win2K is far more stable than Win98. > > Craig > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > Psyche-list@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
