Re: umask is different in 8.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



But when a new child process spawns (say a shell script), the umask is not
inherited.  Is there a fix for that?
-eric wood

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jesse Keating" <hosting@j2solutions.net>
To: <psyche-list@redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: umask is different in 8.0


> On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:21:17 -0500
> "Eric Wood" <eric@interplas.com> wrote:
>
> > In RH 7.0, a umask 0 created files with
> > rw-rw-rw
> > now in 8.0 they are created like:
> > rw-rw-r-
>
> I'm unable to duplicate this behavior.
>
> [jkeating@yoda temp]$ touch foo
> [jkeating@yoda temp]$ umask 000
> [jkeating@yoda temp]$ touch bar
> [jkeating@yoda temp]$ ls -al
>
> -rw-rw-rw-    1 jkeating jkeating        0 Dec 19 11:31 bar
> -rw-rw-r--    1 jkeating jkeating        0 Dec 19 11:31 foo
>
> --
> Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE
> For Web Services and Linux Consulting, Visit --> j2Solutions.net
> Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org)
>
> Was I helpful?  Let others know:
>  http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
>
>
>
> --
> Psyche-list mailing list
> Psyche-list@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux