But when a new child process spawns (say a shell script), the umask is not inherited. Is there a fix for that? -eric wood ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Keating" <hosting@j2solutions.net> To: <psyche-list@redhat.com> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:30 PM Subject: Re: umask is different in 8.0 > On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:21:17 -0500 > "Eric Wood" <eric@interplas.com> wrote: > > > In RH 7.0, a umask 0 created files with > > rw-rw-rw > > now in 8.0 they are created like: > > rw-rw-r- > > I'm unable to duplicate this behavior. > > [jkeating@yoda temp]$ touch foo > [jkeating@yoda temp]$ umask 000 > [jkeating@yoda temp]$ touch bar > [jkeating@yoda temp]$ ls -al > > -rw-rw-rw- 1 jkeating jkeating 0 Dec 19 11:31 bar > -rw-rw-r-- 1 jkeating jkeating 0 Dec 19 11:31 foo > > -- > Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE > For Web Services and Linux Consulting, Visit --> j2Solutions.net > Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) > > Was I helpful? Let others know: > http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > Psyche-list@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list