I asked this before but let me ask it again a different way. There seems to be a lingering memory that the lilo documentation used to refer to the fact that W2k (and/or WinNT) maintained an alternate partition table for its own use. An a warning was issued problems could arise if these two tables were different. However, this statement has disappeared. We have machines that seem to suffer from being in this condition evidenced by the fact that fdisk, fdisk (dos) and partition magic all agree that the linux partition is as it should be. However, the W2k disk manager program reports that the linux partition is FAT 32. Dose anyone have any further information on this matter especially as to where this alternate partition table can be found? -- ------------------------------------------- Aaron Konstam Computer Science Trinity University 715 Stadium Dr. San Antonio, TX 78212-7200 telephone: (210)-999-7484 email:akonstam@trinity.edu -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
