Re: A few things who still suck in RedHat 8 aka constructive criticism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 11:42:46 at 11:42:46AM +0100, Jean Francois Martinez (jfm2@club-internet.fr) wrote:
> > 
> 
> Pleaaaaaaaase.  I do not want the problem solved for myself  I want
> solved for everyone and that means a native form. 

Why can't that "native form" be "completely intgrate apt-get for RPM
and synaptic" in standard Red Hat?

>  And I don't want to
> fuel the arrogance of Debian wanabees: it has more than enough fuel by
> itself.  :-)
>
Even if that were true, do you really care? Why should you? *If*
porting apt-get is technically wrong, please explain why; if it is a good solution,
refusing it only because it comes from Debian is arrogance too, isn't
it?

	Ciao,	
		Marco Fioretti

Red Hat for low memory: www.rule-project.org/en/ 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux