I have to admit to having finally turned down my first submission, as a matter of fact, due to the fact that it wasn't a truly Frequently Asked Question, and also because I view the FAQ we're building to be (as titled on the site) a Redhat Psyche FAQ - meaning it covers the installation, configuration and use of packages distributed by Redhat (or the updates thereto - also distributed by Redhat). The FAQ submission had to do with 'apt', which to me seemed pretty random and irrelevant. Thanks for the support thus far. brian. On Sunday 10 November 2002 12:51 pm, Jack Bowling wrote: > ** Reply to message from "Mike A. Harris" <mharris@redhat.com> on Sun, 10 > Nov 2002 09:54:30 -0500 (EST) > > > On 8 Nov 2002, Brian K. Jones wrote: > > >Date: 08 Nov 2002 14:03:10 -0500 > > >From: Brian K. Jones <jonesy@CS.Princeton.EDU> > > >To: psyche-list@redhat.com > > >Content-Type: text/plain > > >List-Id: Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche) > > > <psyche-list.redhat.com> Subject: Re: FAQ for psyche-list? (was Re: > > > PLEASE READ THIS (was: ...)) > > > > > >So since I've received a submission, there is now a single-question FAQ, > > >just to get us all started. > > > > > >Once I get more time (this weekend) I'll add some myself. In the > > >meantime, whoever wants to can email their own submissions. You can see > > >the FAQ by going to http://www.linuxlaboratory.org and clicking on the > > >'FAQs' link on the left. You don't have to be a member or anything. If > > >you get errors relating to anything like that, lemme know. > > > > Just a suggestion, as per my last email... To make this FAQ > > truely effective, I'm presuming with the idea being to point > > people to the answers to the most annoyingly frequent questions, > > please don't just add random questions people submit to you, or > > it may bloat out to a size people wont want to read. My > > suggestion is to just take the truely most frequently asked > > questions from the list, such as the MP3 situation, and other > > similar things. That'll make a much better document IMHO. > > This is only a problem if the entries are not indexed. Otherwise, I can see > no problem with having a multitude in there. > > jb -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
