** Reply to message from "Mike A. Harris" <mharris@redhat.com> on Sun, 10 Nov 2002 09:54:30 -0500 (EST) > On 8 Nov 2002, Brian K. Jones wrote: > > >Date: 08 Nov 2002 14:03:10 -0500 > >From: Brian K. Jones <jonesy@CS.Princeton.EDU> > >To: psyche-list@redhat.com > >Content-Type: text/plain > >List-Id: Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche) <psyche-list.redhat.com> > >Subject: Re: FAQ for psyche-list? (was Re: PLEASE READ THIS (was: ...)) > > > >So since I've received a submission, there is now a single-question FAQ, > >just to get us all started. > > > >Once I get more time (this weekend) I'll add some myself. In the > >meantime, whoever wants to can email their own submissions. You can see > >the FAQ by going to http://www.linuxlaboratory.org and clicking on the > >'FAQs' link on the left. You don't have to be a member or anything. If > >you get errors relating to anything like that, lemme know. > > Just a suggestion, as per my last email... To make this FAQ > truely effective, I'm presuming with the idea being to point > people to the answers to the most annoyingly frequent questions, > please don't just add random questions people submit to you, or > it may bloat out to a size people wont want to read. My > suggestion is to just take the truely most frequently asked > questions from the list, such as the MP3 situation, and other > similar things. That'll make a much better document IMHO. This is only a problem if the entries are not indexed. Otherwise, I can see no problem with having a multitude in there. jb -- Jack Bowling mailto: jbinpg@shaw.ca -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
