> On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Andrew Smith wrote: > >>As for the US one not having everything on the one DVD - well > > Don't spread FUD. The entire OS is on the DVD, period. What > useful purpose would there be to put part of the OS on the DVD? Docs ... FUD? >>that certainly means to me that I wouldn't bother buying it - >>unless someone can come up with a good technical reason e.g. >>every other CD boots something differently Even then - all the >>CD's could still be on the DVD. Wow - sounds like a good idea to >>market and sell DVD's with ALL of the RedHat stuff on it - then >>anyone could show up RedHat. > > Show up Red Hat how exactly? By duplicating what is already > there? Honestly, why not _look_ at what _is_ there before coming up > with these genius ideas really... It's already in the box. no comment necessary :-) > People are free to make their own DVD's or DVD ISO's of course, > just keep in mind if you plan on selling them, to follow the Red > Hat trademark guidelines: > > http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/guidelines.html > >>Unless there was a DVD space problem :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) > > There is no DVD space problem. > Of course not - it just seems silly not to put EVERYTHING on the DVD Why not put it all on the DVD? I guess it's going to be another 'the lawyers said so' issue. (Of course that doesn't cover the docs not being there!) You still need to have the CD's if you want to access all the data that is on the CD's in the box - much better if 1 DVD was all you needed if you have a DVD drive. The current DVD is full of lots of empty space - why not use it? > -- > Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris -- -Cheers -Andrew MS ... if only he hadn't been hang gliding! -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
