Re: Why is gnome-teminal so slow?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7 Nov 2002, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:

>Date: 07 Nov 2002 20:19:20 +0100
>From: Jean Francois Martinez <jfm2@club-internet.fr>
>To: psyche-list@redhat.com
>Content-Type: text/plain
>List-Id: Discussion of Red Hat Linux 8.0 (Psyche) <psyche-list.redhat.com>
>Subject: Why is gnome-teminal so slow?
>
>Gnome-terminal like shipped in RedHat  8.0 is very, very, very slow.
>The funny thing is that Mandrake 9 cames with exactly the same version
>and it is about ten times faster (not an exaggeration).  As fast as the
>gnome-terminal in Redhat 7.x or the standard xterm.
>
>I thought it could be related to fonts or antialisaing so I tried
>different fonts, turning off antialiasing and kerning but to no avail.

Did you completely quit gnome-terminal after disabling AA, and 
then restart it?  If not, then you wouldn't see any change.

>So why is that RedHat's gnome-terminal is so much slower?

That would require someone to test both, and profile them to see 
why.  It also assumes they're not identical, and just different 
configurations.  Does Mandrake 9 use Xft2/fontconfig and Xft'd 
GNOME/KDE?  If not, then that very well could be your answer 
there.

AA fonts are not accelerated.

-- 
Mike A. Harris		ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer
XFree86 maintainer
Red Hat Inc.



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux