On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 01:15, whitehat wrote: > Apparently the spinlock.h header file included with > gblic-kernheaders-2.4.7.20 for RH8.0 differs > with the spinlock.h in kernel-sources-2.4.18-17.8.0 and this is the, > excuse the pun, source of the problem. it can't. spinlock.h contains kernel-only functionality; the glibc-kernheaders version of this header is just a placeholder to not break when other headers include it....(it's a glibc header after all, kernel mode code doesn't work there) > > Should the two spinlock.h files be the same and if not why not? no... they are unrelated.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
