Re: kpackage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 04 November 2002 11:43, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 08:18:47 -0800
> From: Jesse Keating <hosting@j2solutions.net>
> To: psyche-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: kpackage
> Organization: j2Solutions
> Reply-To: psyche-list@redhat.com
>
> On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 08:46:59 -0700
> "Jim Christiansen" <christiansen_j@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> # Is it just me being reluctant to change and am I missing some great
> # man or faq about redhat-config-packages, because it sure does seem to
> # be thin on power... Correct me if I'm wrong...
>
> more functionality is in the works.  There was a bit of a rush to get
> it out the door for 8.0.  You can type:  rpm -qd redhat-config-packages
> to see a list of documents, once of which is a readme file.

The lack of a working gui for rpm finally made me try apt.  With the 
synaptic gui, it's better than kpackage or gnorpm and seems to do just 
about everything.  Any idea why redhat doesn't just use it instead of 
developing their own?



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux