Re: flashplayer plugin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:50:18PM -0600, Thomas Dodd wrote:
 
> >>>What exactly does xpti.dat do, and does removing it have any
> >>>consequences. The file xpti.dat itself is not very informative.
> >>I don't know what xpti.dat does, but if it's there, there should be a
> >>reason!

> >I didn't remove it either, reasoning that if it is included in mozilla
> >it serves some purpose. But the Flash folks might also have some reason
> >why it would be advisable to remove it.
 
> <mozilla-install-dir>/components/xpti.dat is autogenerated when mozilla 
> is run
> the first time, and recreated if it's missing at later times.
 
> The problem is ownership. Look at the one from Red Hat.
> It's owned by root, and only writable by root.
> same for the whole components directory. So you need to
 
> 1) run mozilla as roo to recreate the file
 
> or
 
> 2) run <mozilla-install-dir>/mozilla-rebuild-databases.pl
> as root to recreate all the autogenerated files. It runs regxpcom
> and regchrome for you.

Thanks for the info. I expected something like that.
But this is no problem for me because I have everything intact, 
no need to recreate anything from Mozilla.

But the question I was actually asking was why the Flash people
advice you to remove xpti.dat after installing flashplayer.

Alexander





-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux