On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Mike Chambers wrote: > > Except for those packages that are built against multiple architectures, why > do we even need the i386 in the name anyway? > > Things like kernel, glibc and such I understand. But if packages are built > to run on just about every machine, then why not just leave it off? They use "noarch" instead. David. -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
