Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:05:22 +0100 (BST), M A Young wrote: > > > This may mean the last mail server your mail passes through before it > > tries to get to a redhat server is unregistered, or is registered in > > some way that upsets the redhat server. It would be useful to see the > > headers on the bounced message and especially the "Received:" ones. > > No, it's a get-host-by-name lookup as demonstrated in my message > from "Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:06:46 +0200" (Message-Id: > <20021016130646.0b863573.rh0210ms@arcor.de> ). I agree having seen that message that my suspicions were wrong, but if I understand your conclusion correctly; that dsl.pipex.com should have an A record as well as an MX record, then I disagree, because it would mean that I would be unable to post to this list, and clearly I can. Michael Young -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
