On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 07:03:12AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > if one plans on using CUPS for printing exclusively, is there any > reason not to remove RPMs associated with LPRng? from the > dependencies list, to remove LPRng, one needs to first remove > redhat-config-printer, but this is just for LPRng config anyway, > no? Indeed. > so, any problems with getting rid of extraneous packages here? > just curious. Not that I know of. Tim. */
Attachment:
pgp00175.pgp
Description: PGP signature
