I found solution: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114158 thanks for your help. rozio ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- Subject: Re: Display is fuzzy with ATI radeon 9000 pro Date: Jueves, 5 de Febrero de 2004 09:37 From: Rocio Alfonso Pita <rozio@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: xfree86-list@xxxxxxxxxx, Alex Deucher <agd5f@xxxxxxxxx> hello, ATI drivers with I'd probed are ATI-4.3.0-13.i386.tar.gz (from 4.2.0-14 I test with all) of gatos.sf.net. yesterday I'd proved the follow: - a knopix and with driver vesa image is correct. - when I prove with my fedora (and RH 9) with vesa drivers, image is fuzzy too. - if I prove with ati drivers (from gatos) the X server don't start. I adjust monitor frecuency, test with autoconfiguration, without second busID... all fails. I think that exists anything in XFree86 programation on Red Hat (fedora) that with my hardware configuration fails. I'd tested a screenshot of my fuzzy image in my (little) win98 in the same computer and image is perfect with that hardware. thanks and regards, rozio A lo que comentaba Alex Deucher el Miércoles, 4 de Febrero de 2004 16:45: > --- Rocio Alfonso Pita <rozio@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > hello, > > > > I have a problem with my ati videocard. The problem is that image > > is > > very fuzzy with configuration detected by fedora. If I download > > latest > > ati drivers, and I configure XF86Config with 2 device for videocard > > with > > buisID, I obtain this error: > > > > (WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID > > PCI:1:0:1) found > > (EE) RADEON(0): No valid mode found for this DFP/LCD > > (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. > > > > Fatal server error: > > no screens found > > Do you mean the latest xfree86 radeon driver or the latest ati binary > driver? Also the secondary PCI id (PCI:1:0:1) is just a place holder > for the windows drivers. If you want to use singlehead or dualhead, > you will need the primary PCI id (PCI:1:0:0) only. if you were only > using the primary ID then you can ignore the warning. I believe that > was fixed in cvs (all secondary ID's were removed from the radeon > driver so it wouldn't try and claim them). > > Alex > > > I open a bug in bugzilla about fedora drivers for ati and > > configuration detected. This is: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114158 > > > > I hope that with yours help I can solve my problem. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > rozio ------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ xfree86-list mailing list xfree86-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/xfree86-list IRC: #xfree86 on irc.redhat.com
