On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 01:04, Alex Deucher wrote: > I suspect it may be a bug in the driver because based on the xfree86 > log that was sent to the list, I never saw the second instance of the > radeon driver start (i.e., radeon(0) is there, but not radeon(1)). It > doesn't look like the shared entity code path is even being taken. My > guess, without looking at the code, is that the check for dualhead, > might be missing your chipset, or perhaps the logic got screwed up at > some point. Dualhead seems to work fine on my m6 based laptop, but > then again I'm using a semi-custom compiled radeon driver based on > 4.3.0. something might have gotten broken in the recent redhat code > updates. I'd check the logic in the redhat version of RadeonPreInit() > and RadeonProbe(). I'll try and check them myself, maybe tomorrow... Thanks, I definitely don't have the expertise to do this myself. ;) Another minor data point: if I add the following to the primary card's Device section: Option "MonitorLayout" "TMDS, TMDS" I get a single screen on the secondary panel, with no video signal on the primary panel. Putting this option in the secondary card's device section has no effect. for-what-it's-worth-ly y'rs, -Barry _______________________________________________ xfree86-list mailing list xfree86-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/xfree86-list IRC: #xfree86 on irc.redhat.com
