Hi, thank you for your reply
> I'm not an expert, but I say to you what I'm trying to do, to let you understand > better the whole context.
> I'm trying to install GTK+, because I need it to install balsa, my email client
> compatible with the qmail maildir format.
> I already installed freetype-2.1.10, but when I tried the fontconfig installation I > received an error message during "configure".
> In this error message, configure couldn't find some functions of
> I already installed freetype-2.1.10, but when I tried the fontconfig installation I > received an error message during "configure".
> In this error message, configure couldn't find some functions of
> freetype-2.1.10.
> Then I thought that maybe I did something wrong during that installation, and > I read again some freetype2 documentation.
> I noticed a statement in which documentation said freetype2 and freetype1
> Then I thought that maybe I did something wrong during that installation, and > I read again some freetype2 documentation.
> I noticed a statement in which documentation said freetype2 and freetype1
> were not compatible.
> Unfortunately, I have not any experience with libraries, and decided to erase > libttf.so.2.3.0 and its symlink, which lied in /usr/lib on my system
> ( I reached this conclusion, because I issued this command:
> find / -iname '*libttf.so*' -print
/usr/lib/libttf.so.2 ----> libttf.so.2.3.0
/usr/lib/libttf.so.2.3.0
> And those libraries had the date of february 2003, when I installed my
> system. )
> At the nex reboot of the system, however, httpd complained giving an error
> message, and I thought it was related with the erasure of
> freetype1 libttf.so.2.3.0.
> I thought that if I have put back this library, httpd wouldn't have complained >anymore, and asked the freetype list whether freetype-1.3.1 would have >provided me with the libttf.so.2.3.0.
> Having got positive answer, I went on trying the freetype1 installation, and
> I thought that if I have put back this library, httpd wouldn't have complained >anymore, and asked the freetype list whether freetype-1.3.1 would have >provided me with the libttf.so.2.3.0.
> Having got positive answer, I went on trying the freetype1 installation, and
> after having overcome a couple of problems, I got it, but then I received
> the error message I described in my previous post.
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, filippo Lombardo wrote:
> I got freetype-1.3.1 compiled on my system, which is RH9.
> It provided me with the libraries:
>
> libttf.la
> libttf.so ----> libttf.so.2.2.0
> libttf.so.2 ----> libttf.so.2.2.0
> libttf.so.2.2.0
>
> installed in /usr/lib
Why would you need libtiff 1.3?! Anyway you should have installed
it in /usr/local/lib.
Probably you have overwritten some libs from the original libtiff
package. You should have installed a newer libtiff package from a fedora
legacy repository instead of compiling it manually.
> "Syntax error on line 6 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf
> Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/libphp4.so into server:
> /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.6 undefined symbol: otvalid_module_class"
>
> Line 6 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf looks like this:
> "LoadModule php4_module modules/libphp4.so"
run the following command:
ldd /usr/lib/httpd/modules/libphp4.so
and see what dependency is broken, maybe you can restore it by
modifying a symlink or something.
Probably you should better download a newer libtiff package and
rebuild php src.rpm package against it (or even download a compatible php
package),
> I got freetype-1.3.1 compiled on my system, which is RH9.
> It provided me with the libraries:
>
> libttf.la
> libttf.so ----> libttf.so.2.2.0
> libttf.so.2 ----> libttf.so.2.2.0
> libttf.so.2.2.0
>
> installed in /usr/lib
Why would you need libtiff 1.3?! Anyway you should have installed
it in /usr/local/lib.
Probably you have overwritten some libs from the original libtiff
package. You should have installed a newer libtiff package from a fedora
legacy repository instead of compiling it manually.
> "Syntax error on line 6 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf
> Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/libphp4.so into server:
> /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.6 undefined symbol: otvalid_module_class"
>
> Line 6 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf looks like this:
> "LoadModule php4_module modules/libphp4.so"
run the following command:
ldd /usr/lib/httpd/modules/libphp4.so
and see what dependency is broken, maybe you can restore it by
modifying a symlink or something.
Probably you should better download a newer libtiff package and
rebuild php src.rpm package against it (or even download a compatible php
package),
> Could you kindly explain to me what the package "php src.rpm" is ?
> I know that there are some files ending with the extension ".src.rpm", but I
> don't understand the relationship with this file "php": what is that ?
> I'll try the command you suggest.
> I'll try the command you suggest.
A lot of thanks for your kindness
My best regards
Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of any company, unless
otherwise expressly stated.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list Redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
