>>>>> "mt" == Miloslav Trmac <mitr@xxxxxxxx> writes:
mt> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:32:35AM -0700, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
>> Isn't S_IFMT defined as part of POSIX and not part of the XSI extensions?
>>
>> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/sys/stat.h.html
mt> See the PDF version. It surely "looks" more official, although in theory
mt> both should be the same. The PDF version has the whole S_IFMT line
mt> XSI-marked.
Interesting.
Is the PDF version available somewhere?
--- Vladimir
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vladimir G. Ivanovic http://leonora.org/~vladimir
2770 Cowper St. vladimir@xxxxxxx
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2447 +1 650 678 8014
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
