On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:32:35AM -0700, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: > Isn't S_IFMT defined as part of POSIX and not part of the XSI extensions? > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/sys/stat.h.html See the PDF version. It surely "looks" more official, although in theory both should be the same. The PDF version has the whole S_IFMT line XSI-marked. Mirek _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list Redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
