On 6 Jul 2003, Sean Bruno wrote: > So it seems to be "distro" related....hmmm... > I don't have a RHL 8.0 or 9 system to test on. If you can take the time, build gcc (the most likely candidate) from the tarball contained in the src.rpm and see whether that has the problem. The spec file contains machine-readable instructions for building it, and you need to replicate them manually (or remove all RH patches). Possibly better is getting the latest gcc 2.95 tarball from an official site and building that using the RH model. If you can't produce the problem with gcc built that way then you have a good case it's a RH patch that has caused the problem. Be aware that binaries build with such a g++ may not run on RHL without some more work. Easier to test (but less likely, IMV, to be the problem) is the kernel. Build one from an offical ftp.kernel.org tarball sans patches. > Anyone from Red-Hat wanna' chime in on this one? > -- Please, reply only to the list. Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list Redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
